One Or Two Complaints

Have you ever sought medical attention only to be told that your visit is limited to an
arbitrary number of concerns, aka “complaints”? What gives?
My initial reaction upon hearing of this two-complaint phenomenon was diagnostic: how
do you know that complaints three and four aren’t going to shed light on complaints one
and two? After all, many diseases affect multiple organ systems. One of the classic
ones which every medical student learns of is Reiter’s Syndrome, or reactive arthritis,
whose mnemonic goes “can’t pee, can’t see, can’t climb a tree.” Now maybe when a
patient tells me they are having burning when they urinate I think to inquire about their
joints rather than jump to thoughts of urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted
diseases, but it’s a whole lot nicer for the patient to be able to volunteer that their getting
a lot of pink eye, and by the way, their joints are hurting. Or more likely the patient is
suffering from high blood pressure, and upon further discussion it is apparent that this
hypertension is connected to sleep apnea and insulin resistance. Many diseases are not
distinct entities.
So why the artificial constraints on patient complaints? The answer is two-fold: time and
cognitive bandwidth. The average primary care physician is seeing 3+ patients per hour.
That’s 20 minutes per slot, during which they must not only address the patient’s
concerns, but document, and wrap up the encounter, lest they are still documenting well
into the evening on patients they saw hours ago. Data entry takes up a large portion of
a physician’s time, because documentation is how the practice gets paid. And if you
only have 5-10 minutes of face time during an encounter, the added complexity of
another complaint is how you run out of time.
Is there any way around this? Unfortunately not in the traditional insurance based
model. Something has to give. Either visits run longer, or patients need to return for
additional visits to say what’s on their mind. And longer visits aren’t compensated by
insurance, so it’s additional visits for the patient which are likely to be deferred into the
far future. Patients get frustrated, and physicians get burned out from practicing
medicine the wrong way.
A concierge practice doesn’t have these constraints. I spend at least an hour and a half
with patients when they onboard precisely so we have adequate time for as many
concerns as you have. I can’t stomach the thought of going back to “factory medicine”,
and neither should you.

Comments